Client Reports
Operator Testimonials
We were about to wire ₩42 million for six used Scrypt miners from an overseas seller. Your bench test on a sample unit showed hashrate settling at 91% of advertised after twelve hours — not catastrophic, but enough to renegotiate. The thermal photos of board three convinced the seller to replace it before shipment.— Dong-wook C., Litecoin hobby miner, Incheon
The farm audit was thorough. Park identified that our aisle containment was leaking hot air into the intake of row four. Fixing that cost us a weekend but dropped average board temps by 11°C. I wish the written report had included a clearer priority ranking — everything was marked urgent.— Sarah T., co-location manager, Yeongdeungpo-gu
Hashboard inspection on our underperforming unit found a bulging capacitor on the voltage regulator. Your report gave us the exact part number and a local repair shop recommendation. Unit back online in four days for a fraction of replacement cost.— Hee-joon M., Dogecoin pool contributor, Suwon
Response time on email questions was slower during the Chuseok holiday week, which I understand. The assessment itself was solid — we now require a Websycamoreway report before any fleet expansion.— Ara K., small farm operator, Mapo-gu
Case Study: Gangnam Co-location Thermal Event
A client operating forty Scrypt ASIC units in a converted office basement contacted us in March 2025 after three units shut down within the same hour. Our on-site visit found the basement’s single exhaust fan had failed silently two days earlier. Intake air temperature at rack height had climbed to 38°C.
We documented per-unit hashrate decline curves, identified the four hottest positions in the rack layout, and recommended temporary fan placement plus a permanent exhaust upgrade. The client implemented our layout changes over one weekend. Follow-up measurements six weeks later showed all units operating within manufacturer temperature envelopes.
The full written report included time-stamped thermal images, PDU load readings, and a parts list for the exhaust upgrade totalling ₩1.8 million — far less than the ₩12 million the client feared they might lose in hardware failure.